Month: February 2026

Retirement Planning Opportunities If You’re in the Top 20% of Savers (Ages 55–70)

If you’ve ever Googled “retirement savings by age,” you’ve probably seen those benchmark numbers that either made you panic or feel like you’re crushing it. But here’s the thing – both reactions might be completely wrong.

Understanding retirement savings by age is something many people get hung up on, but the reality is that these average numbers rarely tell the complete story. Today, we’ll dive into real data from major financial institutions and explain why, if you’re reading this, you’re probably already in the top tier of savers.  And if you’re in that top tier, we’ll discuss specific planning opportunities to help you optimize your retirement. 

What the Average Retirement Savings Data Really Shows

Let’s start by looking at what the major studies actually reveal about retirement account balances across different age groups.

401k Balance by Age: Fidelity’s Latest Numbers

Fidelity releases quarterly benchmarking studies that track average retirement account balances by age. Their data shows that for people in their peak earning years (55-70), the average 401(k) balance hovers around $250,000.

Financial planner in Chattanooga, TN

But here’s the problem with this data: it only includes accounts held at Fidelity. It completely excludes external accounts, creating a major blind spot. There are no taxable brokerage accounts, no HSAs, and no retirement accounts held at other institutions, such as Vanguard or Schwab. This means Fidelity’s numbers aren’t really representative of the entire U.S. retirement landscape – especially not for people who are serious about their financial planning.

The Federal Reserve’s Complete Picture

The Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, conducted every few years, gives us the closest thing to a national financial scoreboard. The 2022 data reveals some eye-opening statistics.

For households in the 55-64 age range:

  • About 8% have retirement account balances between $500,000 and $1 million
  • Roughly 9% have over $1 million in retirement accounts
  • This means approximately 17% of U.S. households in this age group have retirement savings exceeding $500,000

If you’re reading this article and have accumulated at least $500,000 in retirement accounts by your late 50s or early 60s, you’re already in the top 20% nationally. Many readers are likely in that top 10% tier with over a million dollars saved.

The Fed’s survey includes a broad sample of American households – from lower wealth to middle class to high net worth families. Many of the households surveyed may have very little, if any, assets in 401(k)s or IRAs, which skews the averages significantly lower.

Empower’s More Complete Data Set

Empower’s data provides both average and median retirement account balances, which matters because averages can be skewed by ultra-high savers with multiple seven-figure accounts.

For people in their 50s and 60s, Empower shows:

  • Average retirement account balance: roughly $1 million
  • Median balance: about 50% of that average

What makes Empower’s data more valuable is that it doesn’t just include accounts held directly with them. It also incorporates retirement accounts imported through their personal dashboard tool. If someone has accounts at Fidelity, Vanguard, or other institutions, those balances get aggregated into the study, making it more representative of people who actively manage their finances across multiple platforms.

However, even Empower’s data has limitations – it still doesn’t include other retirement assets like taxable brokerage accounts, business investments, or real estate.

Why You’re Probably Not Average

Here’s the reality: if you’re actively researching retirement savings by age and reading detailed financial content, you’re already demonstrating behavior that puts you in a completely different category than the “average” American saver.

The average retirement savings by age data includes everyone, including people who have never opened a 401(k), those who cash out their retirement accounts when changing jobs, and households that prioritize other financial goals over retirement savings.

But you’re different. You’re likely someone who:

  • Has built substantial retirement account balances
  • Maintains accounts across multiple institutions
  • Has diversified beyond just retirement accounts into taxable investments
  • Owns real estate or business assets not captured in these studies

Someone might have $400,000 in a 401(k), but another $1-2 million in taxable brokerage accounts or $3 million in real estate investments. If you’re only comparing retirement accounts, you’re missing half the picture.

This is the key point: if you’re consuming this type of content, you’re probably already in that top 20% of households. You’ve likely saved at least $500,000, and many readers have accumulated seven figures or even multiple seven figures for retirement. You’re playing a completely different retirement game than the average American.

Essential Retirement Planning Strategies for Top-Tier Savers

When you’re in the top tier of savers, your biggest risk isn’t running out of money – it’s retirement planning inefficiency. Here are the critical strategies you need to consider:

Tax Planning: Your Biggest Opportunity

Taxes can actually be one of your biggest expenses in retirement – often ranking as the number one, two, or three largest annual expenses for retirees.

Large pre-tax account balances mean large future required minimum distributions (RMDs). These large RMDs can potentially push you into higher income tax brackets, trigger higher taxes on Social Security income, increase capital gains rates, and activate other hidden taxes. These tax hits compound over time.

If you retire early, you may have lower income years before RMDs kick in at age 73 or 75. This window represents one of the best tax planning opportunities of your lifetime–what’s called the “Roth conversion window.”

Maximizing Roth Conversion Strategies in Early Retirement

During your early retirement years, before RMDs begin, you have the opportunity to strategically convert pre-tax retirement funds to Roth accounts. This means paying taxes now at potentially lower rates to minimize the impact of those ballooning RMDs later.

Roth conversion strategies can also help you:

  • Minimize IRMAA surcharges (hidden taxes on Medicare premiums based on income)
  • Make Social Security income more tax-efficient
  • Create tax-free legacy assets for your heirs

Once this conversion window closes, it shuts for good, making this timing critical for long-term tax efficiency.

Optimizing Your Retirement Withdrawal Strategies

When you have substantial assets across multiple account types–taxable accounts, tax-deferred accounts, and tax-free accounts–the order you withdraw money matters enormously for the longevity of your retirement plan.

The classic approach follows this sequence:

  1. Taxable accounts first
  2. Tax-deferred accounts second
  3. Tax-free accounts last

This default strategy makes sense for many people, but it’s not always optimal. Sometimes it makes more sense to tap Roth accounts first and let tax-deferred accounts continue compounding. Other times, a multi-pronged approach works best–taking baseline distributions from taxable accounts while filling remaining income needs from tax-deferred accounts, even before RMDs begin.

The key insight: retirement withdrawal strategies shouldn’t follow a one-size-fits-all approach. Each year brings a new tax situation that needs to be evaluated and optimized based on your specific circumstances.

Investment Strategy: Risk Capacity vs. Risk Tolerance

Most retirees and many financial advisors focus solely on risk tolerance–how aggressive you feel comfortable being emotionally. But for higher net worth households, we need to discuss something different: risk capacity.

Understanding the Difference

Risk tolerance is emotional and psychological. It’s about how you feel when the market drops 20%. Do you panic? Can you sleep well at night? Can you stay disciplined?

Risk capacity is different – it’s not about feelings, it’s about what your plan can mathematically survive. Can you afford to take on risk in retirement?

Here’s the counterintuitive part: a retiree with a smaller portfolio may actually have less risk capacity than someone with a larger balance.

A Real-World Example

Consider a retiree with $500,000 who needs $30,000 annually (6% withdrawal rate). If the market drops 25%, their portfolio becomes $375,000, but they still need that $30,000. Now their withdrawal rate jumps to 8% – entering the danger zone where retirement plans can fail due to the sequence of returns risk.

Compare this to someone with $2 million who needs $80,000 annually (4% withdrawal rate). If their portfolio drops 25% to $1.5 million, their withdrawal rate only increases to 5.3%. They have margin for error. They can reduce withdrawals, skip inflation adjustments, rebalance, or even take advantage of the downturn.

This is risk capacity: how much volatility can your plan absorb before forcing you to make bad financial decisions?

Where You Hold Investments Matters

Asset location is different from asset allocation. Asset allocation is what you’re invested in. It’s your mix of stocks, bonds, real estate, and cash. Asset location is where you hold those investments.

When you have substantial balances across taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts, where you locate specific investments can significantly impact your after-tax returns.

The Tax Drag Problem

Taxable accounts face ongoing tax drag. Investments may pay quarterly dividends, generate interest income, or distribute capital gains even when you’re not selling anything. When you’re in higher tax brackets, this drag becomes significant and represents one of the most overlooked ways wealth gets eroded–not from market performance, but from unnecessary taxes.

If your taxable account holds high-yield bonds, REITs, and high-turnover funds, you might pay substantial taxes annually even if you’re not spending that income. Meanwhile, your IRA and Roth accounts might be better locations for these less tax-efficient investments.

The goal of asset location is simple: ensure your taxable accounts aren’t dragging down your net after-tax returns. You don’t just need good performance. You need good after-tax performance. It’s not about what you earn; it’s about what you keep.

Legacy Planning for High-Net-Worth Families

If you’re in the top tier of savers, there’s a good chance you won’t spend down all your assets, even if your goal is to “die with zero.” This means you’re optimizing not just for lifetime income, but also for legacy–specifically, tax-efficient legacy.

This becomes especially important if your heirs are high earners themselves: doctors, entrepreneurs, attorneys, or other professionals. What you leave behind matters significantly.

Leaving a pre-tax IRA or 401 (k) to high-income beneficiaries creates a different tax impact than leaving a Roth account or a taxable brokerage account. The most effective planning involves being strategic about which assets to spend aggressively during your lifetime versus which to preserve for beneficiaries.

The Real Takeaway for Top-Tier Savers

If you’ve built substantial wealth and find yourself in the top 20% of U.S. households, your retirement plan is no longer about chasing returns or worrying about having “enough” money. Instead, your focus should shift to:

  • Maximizing retirement plan efficiency
  • Controlling the timing and tax impact of distributions
  • Minimizing lifetime taxes through strategic planning
  • Managing Medicare thresholds and IRMAA surcharges
  • Optimizing Social Security income timing and taxation
  • Taking advantage of Roth conversion windows
  • Planning for tax-efficient legacy transfer

Once you’ve done the hard part–saving and investing to reach financial independence–the game becomes about keeping more of what you’ve built. The strategies that got you to this point aren’t necessarily the same ones that will optimize your wealth throughout retirement.

The Bottom Line

Stop comparing yourself to average retirement savings by age. If you’re actively planning and have accumulated substantial assets, you’re already playing in a different league. Your focus should be on advanced strategies that maximize the efficiency of the wealth you’ve built, not on whether you’re “keeping up” with benchmarks that don’t reflect your reality.

Remember, retirement planning for high-net-worth individuals isn’t about accumulating more. It’s about optimizing what you have for the best possible outcomes throughout your retirement years and beyond.

At Imagine Financial Security, we help individuals over 50 with at least a million dollars saved navigate these complex retirement decisions. If you are looking to

  • Maximize your retirement spending
  • Minimize your lifetime tax bill
  • Worry less about money

You can start by taking our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire on our website at www.imaginefinancialsecurity.com, so we can learn more about how we can help you on your journey to and through retirement.

Not quite ready to take the questionnaire, but want helpful tips and resources? Sign up for our monthly newsletter and/or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.

Ep. 117: TIAA Traditional Explained: How Much to Keep, When to Use It, and What to Do at Retirement

If you’re a TIAA participant, there’s a good chance you own TIAA Traditional—and it may be one of the most misunderstood “investments” in retirement plans.

In this episode, I’m breaking down TIAA Traditional, TIAA Real Estate and answering the biggest questions I hear from TIAA participants:

✅ Should I own TIAA Traditional?
✅ If so, how much should I keep there?
✅ Should I use the TIAA Real Estate Account?
✅ What should I do with TIAA Traditional after I retire?
✅ Bonus: How do I compare to other retirement savers?

We’ll talk about the real issue most people miss—liquidity and contract type—and how TIAA Traditional can be used as a bond alternative or even as a retirement income floor depending on your plan.

Resources mentioned:

TIAA Real Estate Account

Video, How to get money OUT of TIAA (contract breakdown)

Video, Retirement Savings Relative to Peers

⛳ PFR Nation (Who This Is For)

If you’re over 50, have saved seven figures (or multiple seven figures), love golf and travel, and you want to make work optional while minimizing taxes… welcome to the right place.

💬 Comment Below

What is your biggest TIAA question?

Are you interested in working with me 1 on 1?⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠You can start with our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire linked on our website so we can learn more about how we can help in your journey to and through retirement.

Connect with me here:

Or, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit my website

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.

Ep. 116: Are You Stuck in “One More Year Syndrome”?

Lately, I’ve been seeing a TON of retirement planning content telling people:

“Don’t work another year. Retire now. You’re wasting time.”

And honestly… as a retirement-focused financial planner, that message kind of rubs me the wrong way.

Not because it’s always wrong… but because I think there’s an angle behind it.

In today’s episode, we break down what One More Year Syndrome really is, why it’s become such a popular retirement planning trend on YouTube and podcasts, and why you may want to take this advice seriously… but also why you might need to take it with a grain of salt.

Because retirement isn’t just about sitting on the beach 7 days a week.

Retirement should be about purpose, meaning, freedom, and using your time, talents, and treasure in the way that matters most.

I also share a powerful story from a recent conversation with a prospective client who reached out after losing three of his closest friends last year, and how that kind of wake-up call can completely change the way you think about retirement timing.

At the end of this episode, I give you 3 questions to ask yourself to determine whether you’re truly delaying retirement for financial reasons… or if you’re simply afraid of stepping into the unknown.

If you’re in your 50s or early 60s, have saved $1M+ for retirement, and you’re wondering whether you should retire now or work longer, this episode is for you.

✅ Questions Covered In This Episode:

  • Should I retire now or work one more year?
  • Is One More Year Syndrome real?
  • How do I know if I’m financially ready to retire?
  • How do I find purpose after retirement?
  • What if I retire too early?
  • What if I wait too long and regret it?

⛳ PFR Nation (Who This Is For)

If you’re over 50, have saved seven figures (or multiple seven figures), love golf and travel, and you want to make work optional while minimizing taxes… welcome to the right place.

💬 Comment Below:

Are you stuck in “one more year syndrome”?

What’s holding you back from retiring today — taxes, market uncertainty, healthcare, or fear of the unknown?

I’d love to hear from real retirees and pre-retirees.

⁠⁠Are you interested in working with me 1 on 1?⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠You can start with our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire linked on our website, so we can learn more about how we can help in your journey to and through retirement.

Connect with me here:

Or, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit my website

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.

Retirement Planning for Longevity: What If You Live to 100?

What if you retired at 60 and lived to 100? That’s a 40-year time horizon in retirement – meaning you could be retired longer than you were in the workforce. While this sounds amazing on paper, it brings about an entirely different set of challenges that most people aren’t prepared for.

Most people planning for retirement think they need their portfolio to last 15, 20, or maybe 25 years. Some conservative planners might even stretch it to 30 years. But here’s the reality: if current trends in technology and medicine continue, living to 100 might not be as far-fetched as it seems.

With AI and technology potentially helping us live longer, retirement planning for longevity becomes critical. You don’t need to save less because you might live longer – you need to be more thoughtful about how you set up your retirement plan. Longevity will be one of the biggest risks for people retiring in 2026 and beyond.

Let’s explore five specific retirement planning considerations if you’re planning for a 40-year retirement.

Building Retirement Income Planning That Lasts 40 Years

The foundation of any solid retirement plan is creating paychecks in retirement. Effective retirement income planning focuses on generating cash flow because assets that don’t generate income won’t help you pay your bills.

Your retirement plan isn’t just about your portfolio – it’s about building lifetime income that never runs out. Retirement becomes much easier when your baseline necessities and fixed expenses are covered by guaranteed income sources. People who have this foundation sleep well at night, especially when markets are volatile.

Maximizing Social Security Benefits

Social Security will likely be the biggest guaranteed lifetime income stream for most retirement plans. When considering retirement planning for longevity, delaying your benefits until age 70 becomes even more valuable. This is especially important for married couples: delaying the larger benefit maximizes the surviving spouse’s income.

Remember, when one spouse dies, the surviving spouse doesn’t receive both Social Security checks. They receive the larger of the two benefits. If you’re planning for one spouse to potentially live until 100, maximizing that larger benefit becomes critical.

Pension Survivor Benefits

If you have a pension, survivor benefit options require careful consideration. Many people want to maximize what they receive during their lifetime and select a 25% or 50% survivor benefit option.  Sometimes, NO survivor benefit is selected at all. But if one spouse passes away, not only does Social Security drop, but the pension could also drop by 50% or more.

This results in a significant reduction in income for the surviving spouse, who might live another 15-20 years. When planning for longevity, protecting the surviving spouse’s income becomes paramount.

The Role of Annuities in Guaranteed Retirement Income

Annuities have become a four-letter word for many people, but they deserve consideration in retirement planning for longevity. While there are bad products and bad salespeople in this space, the concept of guaranteed income has real value.

Here’s what’s interesting: clients who have annuities never say they wish they didn’t have that guaranteed paycheck coming in. It’s usually the opposite – during market volatility, people wish they had something safe and guaranteed that they could never outlive.

Consider breaking down your expenses into needs, wants, and wishes – or simply fixed expenses and discretionary expenses. Then figure out what percentage of your fixed expenses are covered by guaranteed income sources. If Social Security covers everything, you might not need additional guaranteed income. But if your guaranteed sources only cover 30-40% of your total expenses, that could be concerning during market downturns.

Optimizing Your Retirement Portfolio Allocation for Longevity

Traditional thinking pushes retirees into conservative portfolios because they’re “living on their portfolio.” But you’re not living on 100% of your portfolio in year one – you might be withdrawing 4-7% annually. Being too conservative creates other risks, particularly inflation and longevity risk.

The Inflation Challenge

The longer you live, the more inflation compounds. Over a 40-year retirement, inflation becomes a massive risk. The best hedge against inflation is equities – traditional stocks in your portfolio. If you trim your equity allocation too much, you might not keep pace with inflation, which could be a bigger risk than market volatility.

Rethinking the 60-40 Portfolio

The traditional 60% stocks, 40% bonds allocation has been popular for retirees, but you need to stress-test it for a 40-year retirement. Bill Bengen, the creator of the famous 4% rule, recommended a minimum of 50% in stocks, with as close to 75% stocks and 25% fixed income as possible for optimal results.

When stress testing retirement portfolio allocation strategies for extended retirements, a 60-40 portfolio sometimes carries more risk than a slightly more aggressive allocation. This isn’t about putting everything in AI stocks – it’s about a well-diversified pool of equities that can hedge against inflation and longevity concerns.

Implementing Guardrails

If you choose a more aggressive allocation, you face sequence of returns risk – the danger of a bear market in your first few years of retirement. Since nobody can time the market, guardrails become essential.

Guyton and Klinger developed four decision rules for portfolio management:

  1. The inflation rule
  2. The prosperity rule
  3. The portfolio rescue rule
  4. The portfolio management rule

Following these rules throughout retirement can dramatically increase your starting withdrawal rate while reducing the risk of running out of money. The most dangerous retirement portfolio might be the one that feels safe on paper but quietly lags behind inflation for 35-40 years.

Long Term Care Planning: Protecting Your Future

Nobody likes thinking about getting old and frail, but Father Time is undefeated. Some of us will need help with daily living activities at the end of life. Long-term care planning isn’t just about buying insurance – it’s about having a comprehensive plan.

The Reality of Care Needs

About 70% of people will need some sort of care, but the duration and type vary greatly. It might be cognitive or physical care lasting two years or ten years. This uncertainty makes planning challenging but necessary.

Beyond Just Insurance

Long-term care planning involves several strategies:

  • Dedicated pools of funds
  • Long-term care insurance
  • Home equity utilization
  • Self-funding approaches

Even Warren Buffett has long-term care insurance, despite having enough wealth to self-fund care for 100 years. Why? He doesn’t want his heirs to go through a fire sale of investments to pay for care. Insurance creates a dedicated pool of funds and allows caregivers to hire help.

The Burden Factor

One common concern among retirees is: “I never want to be a burden on my loved ones.” Many people have plenty of money for retirement and care expenses, but are afraid to spend because they worry about unexpected healthcare costs.

Long-term care insurance can give people the freedom to spend their assets and enjoy retirement, knowing they have protection against care expenses. It removes the financial and logistical burden from spouses and adult children who are also worried about their own financial security.

Understanding Retirement Spending Phases

If you’re retiring at 60 and living until 100, assuming your expenses will inflate at 3% annually for 40 years might cause you to retire too late or underspend in your Go-Go Years. Retirement actually has three distinct phases with different spending patterns.

The Go-Go Years

Early retirement represents the honeymoon phase when you’re still active and physically able to do what you want. This is when you hit those bucket list golf trips, travel the world, and experience things you wanted to do while working but didn’t have time for.

Expenses might actually increase during the go-go years due to pent-up demand for activities and experiences. This is when health is in your favor, and you can be most active.

The Slow-Go Years

After checking off major bucket list items, you enter the slow-go years. You’re still traveling and active, but maybe not as frequently. Lifestyle stabilizes, and spending typically moderates from the go-go years.

The No-Go Years

Later in retirement, you enter the no-go years when physical limitations increase. While healthcare costs might spike during this phase (hence the need for long-term care planning), studies show that retirees actually experience inflation that’s about 1% lower than general inflation over their entire retirement.

Planning for Spending Changes

This spending pattern – higher in go-go years, moderate in slow-go years, and potentially lower but different in no-go years – should influence your retirement planning for longevity. Don’t assume linear expense growth for 40 years, as this might cause you to retire later than necessary.

However, if you plan to spend aggressively in your go-go years, those portfolio guardrails become critical. You need flexibility to adjust your withdrawal rate based on market performance, especially if you retire during a downturn.

Retirement Legacy Planning and Gifting Strategies

When planning for longevity, consider that if you live until 100, your adult children might be 70-80 years old when they inherit. This reality should influence your thinking about legacy and the utility of money.

The Concept of Diminishing Utility

Money has diminishing returns as you age. If you don’t enjoy money during your go-go years, you lose the utility of those dollars. The same applies to legacy. There’s a difference between giving money when your children are struggling with mortgages, private school costs, or starting businesses versus when they’re already retired.

Giving with a Warm Hand

Consider the benefits of lifetime giving versus leaving everything as an inheritance. Wouldn’t it be meaningful to see what your beneficiaries do with gifts during your lifetime? This also helps you understand their money management skills, which can inform your estate planning decisions.

If you’re gifting money and your children are using it wisely – contributing to retirement accounts, buying homes, funding education – that validates leaving them more when you’re gone. If they’re making poor financial decisions, you might want to restructure your estate plan with more protections.  Or better yet, have some meaningful conversations with those beneficiaries while you’re still alive.

Current Gifting Opportunities

The annual exclusion allows each taxpayer to give $19,000 per recipient in 2026 without filing gift tax returns. For married couples with married children, this can add up to substantial annual gifts. These gifts also remove future growth from your estate, which is particularly valuable if you face potential estate tax issues.

The key question is: when does your legacy have the greatest utility? During your lifetime, when you can see its impact, after you’re gone, or some combination of both?

Taking Action on Your Longevity Plan

Living longer can be a blessing, but it creates significant challenges for people retiring today. With technology and medicine evolving rapidly, longevity planning becomes essential for anyone approaching retirement.

Review Your Foundation

Start by reviewing your guaranteed income sources. Look at your Social Security strategy and make sure you’re maximizing not only lifetime benefits but also surviving spouse benefits. If you have a pension, carefully consider survivor benefit options.

Stress Test Your Plan

Run scenarios assuming you live until 100. Would your current plan hold up? Does a traditional 60-40 portfolio work, or do you need 75-25 or even 80-20? Test different allocations considering both your risk tolerance and risk capacity.

Address Long-Term Care

Regardless of your wealth level, you need a long-term care plan. This includes communication about who will do what, where funds will come from, and how you’ll pay for care. The goal is to remove financial and logistical burdens from your loved ones.

Plan Your Spending Strategy

Don’t assume linear expense growth for 40 years. Plan for the realities of retirement spending phases, and if you want to spend more aggressively in your go-go years, implement guardrails to protect against sequence-of-returns risk.

Consider Your Legacy Impact

Think about when your legacy will be most useful. Consider lifetime giving strategies that allow you to see the impact of your generosity while potentially providing valuable teaching opportunities for your beneficiaries.

Retirement planning for longevity requires a different approach than traditional retirement planning. The stakes are higher, the time horizon is longer, and the strategies need to be more sophisticated. But with proper planning, a 40-year retirement can be not just financially sustainable, but truly fulfilling.

If you’re looking for help creating a retirement plan that accounts for longevity, consider working with a financial advisor who specializes in retirement income planning. The complexity of planning for a 40-year retirement makes professional guidance more valuable than ever.

At Imagine Financial Security, we help individuals over 50 with at least a million dollars saved navigate these complex retirement decisions. If you are looking to

  • Maximize your retirement spending
  • Minimize your lifetime tax bill
  • Worry less about money

You can start by taking our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire on our website at www.imaginefinancialsecurity.com, so we can learn more about how we can help you on your journey to and through retirement.

Not quite ready to take the questionnaire, but want helpful tips and resources? Sign up for our monthly newsletter and/or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.

Ep. 115: “The 40-Year Retirement Test: Why the 4% Rule Might Be Making You Work Too Long”

Is the 4% rule actually causing people to work 5 to 10 years longer than they need to?

In this episode of The Planning for Retirement Podcast, Kevin Lao breaks down a series of real historical 40 year retirement backtests using withdrawal rates of 4%, 5%, 6%, and even 7%, and the results are shocking.

Using Portfolio Visualizer, Kevin tests how different withdrawal rates would have performed starting in 1986 through 2025, and then compares those results to what happens when you retire into a tougher market environment like the lost decade (starting in 2000).

This episode is all about the real retirement planning lesson most people miss:

👉 The market you retire into matters more than the rule you follow.

And having a flexible withdrawal strategy beats blindly following any one “safe withdrawal rate.”

In this episode, you’ll learn:

• Why the 4% rule was never meant to be personalized

• How a higher withdrawal rate can work in some retirement scenarios

• Why sequence of returns risk can destroy even a “safe” retirement plan

• How Social Security timing can reduce long-term portfolio risk

• Why spending often declines in retirement (go-go, slow-go, no-go years)

• How taxes and account types (taxable vs IRA vs Roth) impact retirement withdrawals

• Why guardrails and flexible income planning are the key to retiring confidently

If you’re approaching retirement and trying to determine your safe withdrawal rate, this episode will help you understand what really matters, and why retirement planning isn’t about following one rule of thumb, it’s about building a plan that adapts.

Resources:

  • Guardrails, 4 Decision Rules

⁠⁠Are you interested in working with me 1 on 1?⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠You can start with our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire linked on our website so we can learn more about how we can help in your journey to and through retirement.

Connect with me here:

Or, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit my website

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.

Ep. 114: Retirement Planning If You Live to 100: 5 Moves You Can’t Ignore

What if you live to be 100 years old?

A lot of retirement plans assume your portfolio needs to last 15–25 years… maybe 30 if you’re being conservative. But if you retire at 60 (or earlier) and live to 100, that’s a 40-year time horizon in retirement — and it changes everything.

In this episode, I walk through five retirement planning considerations to address longevity risk for retirees in 2026 and beyond, including:

• How to build paychecks in retirement (not just a portfolio)

• Why getting too conservative can quietly increase risk over a long retirement

• How to think about Social Security, pensions, and annuities as guaranteed income tools

• Why long-term care planning is a logistics problem (that can become a money problem)

• Spending phases: go-go, slow-go, no-go

• And a legacy concept I love: giving with a warm hand instead of a cold one

📌 Free resource: I’m including a PDF in the show notes on the Guyton-Klinger “guardrails” decision rules (inflation rule, prosperity rule, portfolio rescue rule, portfolio management rule).

Guyton and Klinger Decision Rules

👍 If this was helpful, subscribe and leave a 5-star review on Spotify/Apple Podcasts — it helps us reach and impact more people.

Kevin Lao

Links:

Guyton and Klinger Decision Rules

⁠⁠Are you interested in working with me 1 on 1?⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠You can start with our Retirement Readiness Questionnaire linked on our website so we can learn more about how we can help in your journey to and through retirement.

Connect with me here:

Or, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit my website

This is for general education purposes only and should not be considered as tax, legal, or investment advice.